Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Damn straight. I've already got 2 M6's. If the AE bug really gets to me, a ZI or R2/3a is probably in my future rather than an M7. CV's have a shorter RF base length, but the 1:1 on the R3a is intruiguing and I find the CV VF on my R a little brighter than those on my M6's. The ZI's have a longer RF base length. Lense wise, I have a 50/1.4 ASPH lust, but I can find the strength to resist. My Nokton is doing me just fine for nearly 1/10 the price. Otherwise my 50mm lusts tend toward Leica gear I can easily find used. I'm set for the 21, 28 and 90 FL's. I may come around to replacing my CV 35/2.5P LTM. Can't find a suitable vented hood for the thing. Here a Zeiss 35/2 would probably do the trick quite nicely. I hope ZI does well in the marketplace. Over time might help to rationalize Leica's pricing a bit. Scott Dennis Painter wrote: >That is making this look pretty good: >http://www.zeiss.com/C12567A8003B58B9/ContentsWWWIntern/5FCF6DFD7DA96A31C1256F7000680C3E > >http://tinyurl.com/b4rex > >Jeffery Smith wrote: > > > >>Yep, the M cameras will go up to the low $3K area. >> >> > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >