Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Summilux 35 PRE-ASPH examples
From: vintagebill at verizon.net (bill h)
Date: Thu Jun 2 06:06:13 2005
References: <ILENJKCCOJOKJFHFEFACIENCCPAA.luisripoll@telefonica.net> <6.2.1.2.2.20050602110456.031d3b30@mail.screengang.com>

I enjoyed this article about the 'lux:

http://www.dantestella.com/technical/lux-do.html

bh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Didier Ludwig" <rangefinder@screengang.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 5:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Summilux 35 PRE-ASPH examples


Luis

I fixed it myself, found the folder, here is the link:
http://tinyurl.com/7ljav

Difficult to estimate a lens with rather compressed and downscaled jpgs.
But it's true the lens doesnt seem to be crispy sharp.

Though foto #8 might not have the perfect resolution, it's a very nice shot
and this makes the lenses inconveniences forgettable!

Didier



>Hi all,
>
>I've not do the same comparison on the same conditions Lux/Cron, I show
>these pictures to demonstrate IMO why I'm not really satisfied with the Lux
>35 Pre ASPH
>
>Pic #3 is cropped from #2, with bad definition (it was at 1/250 f.5,6 or
>4.?)
>No. 1, 4, 5 are correct
>On No. 6 and 7 I think that lens show some flare
>No. 8, I don't remember if it was at 1,4 or 2, that's sure it was a 1/30. 
>No
>definition, bad quality.
>These are my opinions, I hope have the time the week end to do trials
>Lux/cron
>What do you think?
>Saludos desde Barcelona
>Luis

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


In reply to: Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Summilux 35 PRE-ASPH examples)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Summilux 35 PRE-ASPH examples)