Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] WWII GI's and Cameras
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Mon May 30 20:57:13 2005
References: <1d9.3d5d8ce3.2fc8e0f0@aol.com> <000201c5636c$925810f0$24a0fea9@MacPhisto> <22b7f5270e030225457a119fb029a739@comcast.net> <01ef01c56554$eeb191c0$24a0fea9@MacPhisto> <3.0.2.32.20050530225853.01eedd8c@pop.infionline.net>

Wasn't this simply to keep the enemy from developing the negs to
gather information? or am I imagining that?


Dave

On 5/30/05, Marc James Small <msmall@aya.yale.edu> wrote:
> It has long been a rule in the US military than a soldier cannot carry a
> camera into a combat zone.  This was true in the trenches of World War I;
> it is true today in Iraq.  There have never been any exceptions to this 
> rule.
> 
> However, many soldiers have gotten away with this, as witness the Abu
> Ghraib shots.  It is a matter of command interest and emphasis, and not all
> commanders are as involved as are others.
> 
> Marc
> 
> 
> msmall@aya.yale.edu
> Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!
> 
> NEW FAX NUMBER:  +540-343-8505
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
>


Replies: Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:WWII GI's and Cameras)
In reply to: Message from Afterswift at aol.com (Afterswift@aol.com) ([Leica] WW II Leicas)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: WW II Leicas)
Message from ealadner at comcast.net (Eric Ladner) ([Leica] Re: WW II Leicas)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: WW II Leicas)
Message from msmall at aya.yale.edu (Marc James Small) ([Leica] WWII GI's and Cameras)