Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks John for your advice, I'll do the comparison for Didier and the Lug and after we can discuss again. Saludos cordiales, Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En nombre de John Collier Enviado el: domingo, 29 de mayo de 2005 22:29 Para: Leica Users Group Asunto: Re: [Leica] Summilux M 1,4/35 PRE ASPH deception I have heard some people rave about their 'lux pre-asphs. Though soft and fuzzy wide open, it should be a good performer at f/2. The pre asph 'cron at f/2 is not exactly state of the art at f/2 either. I think it might be worthwhile to get a CLA from a good Leica tech IF you really only need f/1.4 in emergencies. If you would like to use f/ 1.4 often, get an Asph. John Collier On 29-May-05, at 11:48 AM, Luis Ripoll wrote: > I never thought that my Summilux 35mm should need a CLA, > cosmetically it is > in perfect condition, clean and perfect glass, but in fact I was > deceived > and surprised using it, I think that such lens should give better > results > near to the Summicron except at 1,4. > > Do you think that cosmetically appearance is not real about the > real lens > condition? _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information