Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't think it wouldn't change the composition, because I only saw it at a second glance. But on that second glance I was wondering where the feet went to, esp. because they're partly on it. In those cases I always have the tendency to crop them really away. But that is only how I do it, and might be opposed to how a majority does it. Don't know: it's just a feeling. > From: lkhermann <lkhermann@bresnan.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 07:00:22 -0600 > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW 19 LKH > > At 11:01 AM 5/12/2005 +0200, you wrote: >> Very nice one. Colors included. >> Just after a while I realised the feet fell off. Esp. Those of the camera >> assistant. Is this a scan of the full neg? >> >> >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/Lee-Hermann-album/PAW19_001 >>> > > Philippe, > I cropped a small portion. The original did not have the > feet. The girl was standing on a small ladder and I had just a portion of > the assistant's feet. I did the crop to eliminate a portion of a frame at > the right side of the image and I kept the 4 x 6 proportion. Do you think > the feet would improve the composition? > Lee > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >