Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/04/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Photojournalists and permission
From: mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura)
Date: Tue Apr 19 16:24:39 2005
References: <a06001087be8a5d3e4237@gpsy.com><f9c06530cb9369acfa74577701f1a5a9@earthlin k.net> <42651EF4.70505@cox.net> <a06001000be8ad4a03d21@gpsy.com> <p06210204be8ae618e2d3@[10.4.1.193]>
>Karen, I think many of us believe we hold ourselves to a very high
>standard. Just because they are not your standards doesn't make them
>of lower value.
>
>
>There is no absolute answer.
I agree, and that is why I have said *repeatedly* that these are my
own standards and people can feel free to do as they please. My
position as an academic certainly puts me in a different category
than others. I've tried to state this repeatedly in each message.
Karen Nakamura
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/
http://www.photoethnography.com/blog/
--
Replies:
Reply from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Photojournalists and permission)
In reply to:
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Photojournalists and permission)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Photojournalists and permission)
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Photojournalists and permission)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Photojournalists and permission)