Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I get the LUG in digest form, and I think this is a first--I agree with every word in every post from B.D.! ;)) Seriously, B.D., all your posts on this matter reflect my thoughts exactly, and your observations about the academic perspective, IMHO, are spot on. Also, Ted and Henning, I thought you had great things to say as well, FWIW. I mean, if a person is a "creep" because he takes a picture surreptitiously, HCB would've been one creepy dude. And that just ain't the case. Craig > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:41:29 -0400 > From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> > Subject: RE: [Leica] BD PAWS > To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org> > Message-ID: <00c401c544fe$a339e6f0$6501a8c0@ccapr.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > How did we get from shooting scenes in public to pornography? Good > Lord. > And "stealing" photos? Well, at least we know where you're coming from. > > And by the way, one can do documentary work without asking for > permission and without talking to subjects afterwards - depending upon > what one is documenting. I would politely suggest that you are > confusing > doing anthropological work, or ethnography as you would have it, with > doing photojournalism, traditional documentary photography, and street > photography. I can guarantee you that Gary Winnogrand, Lee Friedlander, > and, for that matter, HCB, didn't go up to their subjects afterward to > chat them up and get releases. If all photographers had adhered to your > "high" standards, the world of photography would be a pretty barren > place. ;-)