Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Rick, I started flying light planes in 1957, and, on most days, visibility was great. By the time I could no longer maintain my Medical Certificate, in 1993, in the mid-south USA you could expect one clear day following a frontal passage and then it was back to the haze layer once again. I'm a believer in the fact that things have been changing, not for the better, for nearly 50 years. Jim Nichols > [Original Message] > From: Rick Dykstra <rdcb37@dodo.com.au> > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: 4/11/2005 3:19:17 PM > Subject: [Leica] Global dimming and photography > > So there's this thing called Global Dimming, caused by soot and > particles from exhausts, aero engines and industry, which has caused an > increase in clouds (reducing the immediate impact of Global Warming) > and causing a major reduction in the amount of sunlight reaching the > surface of the earth. It must be true - I saw it on telly. It was the > immediate aftermath of 9/11 that brought it to prominence - the skies > were suddenly much clearer without all the air traffic - and > temperatures rose noticeably. > > Anyway, the measurable differences in light levels in various places > around the world, now vs 50 years ago, is huge. Like 15% on average > and up to 25% in some places, such as Russia. > > So, has anyone noticed the difference? Do the rule on thumb exposure > methods leave you with underexposed shots now? It was Doug's post on > using an SL body for K25 that prompted me to mention this. Is there > enough light anymore for such slow films? > > Maybe Global Dimming will be Leica's salvation - fast lenses will be > all the go. ??? > > Rick. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information