Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LC1 vs 20D comparison
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Fri Apr 8 09:27:23 2005

Hi, Simon - I wasn't endorsing the LC1, just commenting on the sensor
size/pixel count issue. It doesn't surprise me at all that the Canon
produces superior results. I those results are accounted for by two
things - software/firmware, and pixel SIZE. If I understand the
technical arguments, the thing that counts more than the number of
pixles is the size of the pixels - and the Canon sensor pixels are
larger.

B. D.

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Simon Ogilvie
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:48 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] LC1 vs 20D comparison


BD.  I agree about the sensor size, but I'm not convinced that noise is
the only problem.  I used the LC-1 at 100ASA (its lowest setting) and
the uniform colour areas in the pictures were always mosaic-patterned
when the same areas on the 20D shots were uniformly smooth.  I think
this is either caused by the differences between the CCD and CMOS
sensors, or the in-camera image processing software, or most probably
both.  I haven't been able to compare with a Digilux 2 to see if its
software does a better job.

The CCD in the LC1/digilux 2 is relatively large compared with most
digital P&S's although I accept it's still a lot smaller than the 20D's.

Simon.

On Apr 8, 2005 4:13 PM, B. D. Colen <bdcolen@earthlink.net> wrote:
> The limiting factor is NOT the resolution - it's the sensor size. I 
> have an 8 mgp P&S with a typically-tiny sensor, and an E-1 with a 5mpg

> 4/3 sensor - the 8mpg gets noisy by 400 iso and is a joke at 800. The 
> E-1 is fine at 400 and useable up to 1600, or in desperation, 3200. 
> More over, I can blow the E-1 images way up, and can't go as far with 
> the 8 mgp camera. Taking the LC1 or similar camera up to 8-10 mgp 
> wouldn't improve things - it would probably make them worse.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf 
> Of Simon Ogilvie
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:44 AM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] LC1 vs 20D comparison
> 
> Hi Will,
> 
> I agree - I really liked the LC1, but the form factor means it would 
> be competing with my 20D for usage and would lose out every time.  If 
> I wanted/needed to take something small and light, then the LC1 
> wouldn't suit either.  For that, at the moment I'm using a Fuji F810, 
> but I'm not entirely happy with it.  Would you be able to post a 
> full-size image from your Sony for me to look at?  I've tried a 
> Samsung camera with a Zeiss lens, but the image quality wasn't good 
> enough (for me at least).
> 
> Thanks,
> Simon.
> 
> On Apr 8, 2005 3:28 PM, Will von Dauster <vondauster@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Simon wrote (snipped):
> >
> > > However, the big decider for me was the image quality.  Doubtless 
> > > the LC1 is better than most if not all digital P&S cameras, but 
> > > it's
> 
> > > a long way behind the 20D in image quality.
> >
> > > Anyone else have similar or oposing opinions?
> >
> > A fair comparison and consistent with my own experience vv my 20D 
> > and a good friend's LC1. This is not to say that the photos from the

> > LC1 do not have their own character, which I find pleasing. It's 
> > main drawback is the limiting 5MP resolution. I wonder if we will 
> > see a 7.2
> 
> > - 10MP version with a better and faster viewfinder. That would be 
> > very
> 
> > interesting to me.
> >
> > I'm actually quite pleased, for a point and shoot, with my Sony 
> > DSC-V3
> 
> > and its "Zeiss" lens.
> >
> > Will von Dauster
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from simon.ogilvie at gmail.com (Simon Ogilvie) ([Leica] LC1 vs 20D comparison)