Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Is that so wrong?
From: enitka1 at comcast.net (Ernest Nitka)
Date: Sat Feb 26 09:54:49 2005
References: <83.223531cd.2f5210d2@aol.com>

Nothing wrong at all - I think you'd find most of us on the list are 
right there with you.

ernie
On Feb 26, 2005, at 10:50 AM, Afterswift@aol.com wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
>
> I'm on a few photo lists -- at least that's what I thought they were 
> -- until
> I began to realize that folks were passing off photo-graphics as 
> traditional
> photographs. There's nothing wrong with graphics, but I'd like to know 
> that
> what I'm looking at represents a thing, person, time, and place that 
> actually
> existed.
> Is that so wrong?
>
> Maybe, just maybe, the work I see on LUG's websites are true 
> photographs.
> It's my last hope.
>
> Bob
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from Afterswift at aol.com (Afterswift@aol.com) ([Leica] Is that so wrong?)