Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Porsche and Leica
From: woc2 at earthlink.net (Bill O'Connell)
Date: Wed Feb 23 20:47:48 2005

But then it wouldn't be a Cayenne......

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+woc2=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+woc2=earthlink.net@leica-users.org]On Behalf Of Feli
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 11:05 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Porsche and Leica


Guys, if the M had autofocus, it may as well be a Contax G.
There is no point to having AF in a rangefinder camera.

Feli


On Feb 23, 2005, at 5:32 AM, Bill O'Connell wrote:

> Rick asks "What would the Leica equivalent of the Cayenne be?"
>
> Why the R10 autofocus digital would be the turbo and the M8 autofocus
> digital would be the V8, with pocket sized PHD as the V6......
>
> Bill
________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005



Replies: Reply from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Re: Porsche and Leica)
In reply to: Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Re: Porsche and Leica)