Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Tmax 3200 (att: Bill)
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Fri Feb 18 02:59:05 2005

Does anybody have any suggestions to get less grain?
I've seen HC110 developed Tmax-3200 with less grain, but if developed at
standard dilutions, it seems to get too much of it.
Ofcourse this is a matter of taste.


> From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@edd.uio.no>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:32:56 +0100 (MET)
> To: <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] Tmax 3200 (att: Bill)
> 
> Hi again Bill,
> 
> I didn't go up to 6400 in my test and I don't think I will. 3200 looks
> about like as far as I want to go.
> 
> Nothing is art, this is just a test roll shot around the house and at the
> office yesterday.
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/Tmax-3200
> 
> The one of my son by a window illustrates why I'd like to have good
> framelines for the 40mm Summicron. All the others are with the 50 and
> close to wide open (2.8 at the most).
> 
> I've printed out a couple just to see how they look on print. Not bad,
> particularly if you don't have a choice.
> 
> I'll be giving it a try this week-end. If I get a chance, I'll run another
> roll through today and develop in Xtol. All of these in the folder now
> have been processed with HC110 according to Kodak's recommendations.
> 
> Best,
> Daniel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Tmax 3200 (att: Bill))
In reply to: Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Tmax 3200 (att: Bill))