Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Considering the escapist mentality and the very long planning delays of Solms on one side, and the quick-stepping digital market on the other side, I cannot imagine they have been planning this lens in relationship to a digital sensor crop factor. I guess they're just mathematically fulfilling their lens lineup which has a Summilux, a Summicron and an Elmar on most focal lenghts except the 75mm. So we still miss a 2.8/75 collapsible Elmar :-) The crop factors will change with each generation. Even if there will be, hopefully next year, a digital M with that rumoured 1.37 factor, the overnext one, if there is, will have a fullframe sensor like Canon has it already now - an all this calculations with cropfactors will be a quickly forgotten phenomenon of the analog-to-digital-switcher era. I'm not shure if Leica will survive that. By the way, for me, the 75mm focal length works very well. But I prefer the 1.4 to the 2.0 as I use this lens especially for shooting in small music clubs with low light. Didier >BUT lets assume they are thinking down the road: 75 x 1.37 = 102.75 Rumor >has it that the digital M will not be full frame, but will have a 1.37 mag >factor like the R-Module. >feli > >...it's too long to be a 50 and not long enough to be a 90 - which is to >say, a short tele.