Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Feb 5, 2005, at 9:12 AM, B. D. Colen wrote: > The only thing against it - and I sold mine because of > this - is that 75 is a neither/nor focal length; it's too long to be a > 50 and not long enough to be a 90 - which is to say, a short tele. That's my thinking. Not much longer than a 50, but without the reach of a 90. BUT lets assume they are thinking down the road: 75 x 1.37 = 102.75 Rumor has it that the digital M will not be full frame, but will have a 1.37 mag factor like the R-Module. feli _______________________________________________________ feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4 www.elanphotos.com