Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Chandos, I like the second image, which doesn't have the blurred motion of the other two. You could get to a higher shutter speed with a faster lens, but you would probably lose the depth of field that makes the second image a great picture. Just my thoughts. Jim Nichols nicholsj@edge.net > [Original Message] > From: Chandos Michael Brown <chandos@cox.net> > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: 1/20/2005 5:24:14 PM > Subject: [Leica] Three tries at one image > > > The other night I exposed about 30 frames at ISO 800 with the Olympus > E1, in part because I'm trying to capture something I see every day and > in part because I'm messing around with an all digital workflow. These > were made with the Zuiko 11-22/2.8-3.5, at the focal length of 22. They > were exposed at 1/20-1/30 @ 3.5 and mildly cropped to reduce the clutter > in the room. > > I experimenting with PhaseOne's Capture Pro for RAW conversion into > PhotoShop 7 (which I still use); B&W conversion with Fred Miranda's PS > plug in. The tonal range on these images is spectacular, except for the > predictable blown spectral highlights around lighting sources. > > I found it tough going to get reasonably sharp results at this shutter > speed and where there's a lot of movement (here's where one distinctly > feels the absence of fast Leica glass and why I pant for Zuiko's > soon-to-be-released fast normal prime), but I'm curious, do *any* of > these final-cut images work? > > > http://cmbrow.people.wm.edu/photography/New/1172223BW.htm > > http://cmbrow.people.wm.edu/photography/New/1172228BW.htm > > http://cmbrow.people.wm.edu/photography/New/1192262BW.htm > > > Cheers! > > Chandos > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information