Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If Voigtlander had come out with an R1 (an R2 with an LTM mount) instead of discontinuing the R, there would at least be a new LTM body out there. Sadly, both the R and the Phenix and the Yasushira (sp?) are history. On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:22:12 -0700, GREG LORENZO <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> wrote: > A poll I did a few months back resulted in more than 50 Luggers' still > using LTM cameras from time to time, some exclusively. There are more LTM > users on other lists such as photo.net, the MUG and the LEG to name a few. > > The 4th generation 35/2 lens seems an ideal LTM (but less likely) > candidate. > > Regards, > > Greg > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jeffery Smith <jefferys@gmail.com> > Date: Saturday, January 15, 2005 6:07 pm > Subject: Re: [Leica] Elmar 50mm f2.8 thoughts/opinions > > > Are there enough people with LTM cameras to make it worthwhile in the > > long run? Most of us aren't collectors per se, and with such an array > > of LTM lenses currently available, I don't know how it could be cost > > effective. > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >