Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]true enough, but the the Zeiss Ikon body also has a MAP in the US of $1800 -- or possibly more due to the recent dollar fall by the time it arrives on dealer shelves in April 2005 3x the price of the R3A or the R2A, which will arrive about 3 months before the Zeiss Ikon and has 35/50/75/90 framelines The M7 is certainly a better camera than the other choices above, but not everyone can justify the M7's much higher investment. Stephen Bill Marshall wrote: > The problem with the R3A as a replacement for the M7 is that you're > restricting yourself to a short baseline & to a viewfinder that only shows > 40 mm framelines & longer. If that fits your shooting style, fine. I agree > with Karen. The Zeiss Ikon presents neither of these limitations. > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information