Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Worry ... innocence. (probably not, but as it stands ...) On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Raimo K wrote: > So what is this image about and what?s going on there? Only instantaneous > answers, please. > All the best! > Raimo K > Personal photography homepage at: > http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <SonC@aol.com> > To: <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:35 PM > Subject: Re: [Leica] New Yorker - Now literalism > > > > Madison: http://www.leica-gallery.net/wccjr/image-46065.html > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > In a message dated 12/15/2004 11:30:33 A.M. Central Standard Time, > > bdcolen@MIT.EDU writes: > > Richard Taylor observed that the Gladwell New Yorker article while > > interesting, > > had nothing to tell us about "Leica photography" because, after all, > > unless a > > photo is an abstract, we can look at it and instantly know what it's > > about > > and what's going on...Which leads me to observe.... > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >