Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Daniel, That's a great shot. It's definitely worth showing again. I'll have to reconsider the Hektor if I run across a good buy. I have used other 135s on my IIIf, but never could overcome the parallax to my satisfaction. Jim Nichols nicholsj@edge.net > [Original Message] > From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@edd.uio.no> > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: 12/12/2004 4:00:59 AM > Subject: Re: [Leica] The 135/4.5 Hektor > > Well, I've shown this picture before, but since it _is_ on topic, taken > with the 135/4.5 Hektor, I'll do it again. I don't use it that much. You > _do_ have to stop it down a fair amount, but at close range, like this > shot, you want to anyway. > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/album13/04v24_0016 > > She's smirking, not smiling. > > Daniel > > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Walker Smith wrote: > > > I have a 1946 black Hektor 135/f-4.5 in screw mount that I like very > > much. It cost me $9.95 plus $10.00 shipping and is a MUCH better lens > > than most would give it credit for. > > > > Walker > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information