Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital Module R sensor vs EOS 1D IIS
From: rdcb37 at dodo.com.au (Rick Dykstra)
Date: Wed Dec 8 00:03:24 2004
References: <F4B5127A-48A2-11D9-8C8E-000A95C33F68@dodo.com.au> <000701c4dcb2$128fcd40$87d86c18@ted> <72D47406-48A7-11D9-8C8E-000A95C33F68@dodo.com.au> <34FC46B2-48ED-11D9-B77C-0003938C439E@btinternet.com>

Hi Frank.  I don't want it to be so rare that I've got no-one to talk 
to about it!  I really want it to be good.  Really, really good.  So 
that I don't have reservations about buying one.  So far with my Leica 
journey I've not been disappointed, through feeling let down as new 
products were released.  The utility of my earlier equipment has not 
been undermined and I've appreciated the measured advances.  Digital 
introduces a whole new ballgame in this respect - it can make people 
feel burned after buying eye-wateringly expensive gear.  Hence the need 
for the DMR to be especially good in the first place, as well as 
upgradeable.  Who would want their DMR to end up like one of those 
Leica badged Fuji things from a few years ago?  It's gotta be good!

Rick


On 08/12/2004, at 6:46 PM, Frank Dernie wrote:

> At the present rate of running down the R digiback it could end up as 
> rare and collectable as an original MP.
> Frank
>
> On 7 Dec, 2004, at 23:26, Rick Dykstra wrote:
>
>> Hi Ted.  I hope they do up the pixels, and with this first release.  
>> I was told that the plan is to make the unit upgradeable with newer 
>> sensors.  Good plan - but they gotta get folk on board first.  I may 
>> have to invoke my mantra - "I wont take up digital until it's better, 
>> cheaper and more convenient than film."  It's worked so far.  I 
>> haven't lost a single Dollar to Digital Depreciation.  The D3 
>> phenomenon.
>>
>> What's the prediction?  What will Leica R gear be worth in 40 or 50 
>> years?  Or more.  Will it be like that MP we saw on 'that place'?
>>
>> Rick.
>>
>> On 08/12/2004, at 10:11 AM, Ted Grant wrote:
>>
>>> Rick Dykstra said:
>>>
>>> A whole bunch of stuff I haven't got a clue. ;-)
>>>
>>> However... this?  >>>>>> Ideal solution?  Leica/Kodak/Imacon ups the 
>>> pixels! :-)<<<<
>>>
>>> Rick, yeah I suppose, but by the time the above happens  how the 
>>> hell am I going to hold an R8 with digi- parts at the age of 102? 
>>> ;-) ;-)
>>>
>>> ted
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from rdcb37 at dodo.com.au (Rick Dykstra) ([Leica] Digital Module R sensor vs EOS 1D IIS)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Digital Module R sensor vs EOS 1D IIS)
Message from rdcb37 at dodo.com.au (Rick Dykstra) ([Leica] Digital Module R sensor vs EOS 1D IIS)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Digital Module R sensor vs EOS 1D IIS)