[Leica] Digital back

[leica_korenman at hotmail.com (eric)]

minor detail - is that a few dead pixels in the white arch just to the right 
of the blue "P" sign?
Look at it at 300% mag.

Eric

--------------------------------------------------
www.faneuil.net

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rick Dykstra" <rdcb37@dodo.com.au>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital back


> Do we have the parameters for this shot?  Shutter speed, aperture, lens, 
> ISO setting, anything else.
>
> Looks like about 1/15th or 1/30th given the blur of the pedestrians, so 
> given the reasonably bright but diffuse light (and assuming ISO 100), it's 
> probably taken at f16.  There, that's my guess.  1/15th at f16, but which 
> lens?
>
> During the Chat the Leica dudes did say that the shot of the flowers in 
> the church (also available at the Leica site, DMR section) was shot wide 
> open.
>
>
> On 25/11/2004, at 11:29 AM, animal wrote:
>
>>>
>>>> Just curious did you receive the
>>>> 3876x2580  28.6 meg version ?
>>>>
>>> Simon, I get a 29.3 mb Tiff file. Incredible colours and 3d like image. 
>>> If
>> this is what Leica intended to convey with this Tiff they did a good job 
>> of
>> it.
>>>
>>> I suspect B.D. can't down load it due to Leica filtering out unnecessary
>> "noise".
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>> Yes i thought so too and unsharpened as well.
>> Also liked the detail in the far corners especially the chairs in the 
>> lower
>> right corner.
>> I,m a bit suprised that they used such a small opening.
>> Or is diffraction not a factor with these pixel sizes?
>> best,simon jessurun
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>