Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] digital R question
From: s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal)
Date: Wed Nov 24 00:36:09 2004
References: <005101c4d1fd$cb2d6f20$4649c33e@marvin> <A781A919-3DF1-11D9-9CD3-000A95C33F68@dodo.com.au>

Well the anouncement that you cannot exchange the back often because of wear
makes it less attractive to me.
A new back with a large sensor would be tempting at 16 +mp would those 22
chips fit inside a r lens image circle?
best simon jessurun ,away

> someone asked about this in the chat and the answer was along the lines
> of "Good idea.  Thanks for the suggestion.  It might attract new
> customers."
>
> Are they foxing?
>
> I would still go for the digi back I think, unless the dedicated digi
> body had significant advantages.
>
> I'd have to think that a dedicated digital R (DDR as distinct from DMR
> :-)  ) is inevitable.
>
> Rick Dykstra
>
>
> On 24/11/2004, at 7:15 PM, animal wrote:
>
> > There is a persistent rumour here that Leica will anounce a digital R
> > body next year for release in the fall.
> > Wonder if the downpayment on the digital back will be transferable.
> > hmmm.
> > best
> > simon jessurun
> > Frankfurt
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from rdcb37 at dodo.com.au (Rick Dykstra) ([Leica] digital R question)
In reply to: Message from s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal) ([Leica] digital R question)
Message from rdcb37 at dodo.com.au (Rick Dykstra) ([Leica] digital R question)