Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 35mm normal vs. ASPH or aspherical lens
From: bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C)
Date: Wed Nov 17 13:32:48 2004
References: <2906535AB89CD71199C70002A513ADBD0898B089@exlon05b.lehman.com>

You know what they say, one person's "sh***" is another person's "sh**"

-dan c.

At 11:42 AM 17-11-04 -0800, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>On 11/17/04 9:55 AM, "Beddoe, Neil" <nbeddoe@lehman.com> typed:
>
>> Ooh and ouch!.  The asph is razor sharp with very high contrast.  The non
>> asph is just sharp with pretty good contrast.
>> 
>Erwin has forbidden us in the past from using the "S" word.
>
>As it is fairly meaningless and deceptive.
>
>My moneys on the ASPH though being "S"er than the non ASPH. Anyday.
>
>Especially at the edges.
>
>However if you're shooting digital than you'll not need the edges....!:)
>
>Mark Rabiner
>Photography
>Portland Oregon
>http://rabinergroup.com/
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 35mm normal vs. ASPH or aspherical lens)
In reply to: Message from nbeddoe at lehman.com (Beddoe, Neil) ([Leica] 35mm normal vs asph or aspherical lens)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 35mm normal vs. ASPH or aspherical lens)