Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I was fortunate in being able to use a RD1 at the Williamsburg LHSA meeting two weeks ago. I essentially agree with Ian Watts observations. I shot about fifty images using a 21 mm Asph , 35mm Summicron Asph, and a 50mm Summilux Asph. I shot them all as jpg because I did not have the proprietary software to convert RAW images. Further, I used automatic setting and only varied the f stop to shoot at least 1/250th. Given that, I produced JPG images of about 3.6MB. I made some mistakes and had to discard about 10% of the shots because of technical errors of focusing (essentially my fault), failure to set the correct aperture, etc. I then threw out a whole bunch because I didn't like the composition or busyness of the image. But I did print about twenty 8/10 glossies through Photoshop on an Epson R800 printer and I am more than happy with them. In Photoshop I did tweak some magenta out of the image and used a slight amount of unsharp mask. I could not be more pleased with the results, The images were Leica sharp with a broad dynamic range. Technically the histograms showed no clipping at either end and I seem to have used the full gamut. But, subjectively, one immediately noticed how good the shadow detail appeared. The camera had a comfortable "Leica" feel. I like the notion of being able to use my Leica lenses and carry two bodies (an "M" for transparencies and an RD1 for prints). This is a practical "carry-around" program. I have been unable to find a store that has the camera in stock in the US. B&H emailed me yesterday and said they had the camera but when I called them this morning, they were sold out. When I asked how many they had received, the answer was "I dunno, maybe 30 or 40." I suspect they got considerably less but the fact remains someone has seen the iron in the US. Ed Kowaleski ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Watts" <i.watts@virgin.net> To: <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 8:01 AM Subject: [Leica] Epson RD-1 (initial user experience). > [I have already posted this to a couple of online forums but thought it > might be of interest to some on the LUG.] > > > Temptation proved too strong. Although I have had (and still have to an > extent) my doubts concerning the short rangefinder baselength of this > camera, I decided that the opportunity to use my beloved M lenses in > conjunction with a pure digital (rather than film>scan) workflow was too > good to ignore. > > I will have to reserve judgement on actual image quality until I can get > an > image onto my Mac. I rather foolishly assumed that the camera would come > with a cable to connect it to a USB port but the it seems the only way to > import images is via an SD card reader (which, Sod's law states, I haven't > got). I have used this class of digital camera for some time (D60, 10D, > etc.) so I don't expect any major surprises as far as image quality goes. > 6MP images from APS sized sensors are a well known quantity by now. For > what > it's worth, I was able to review test images on the rear LCD (jpeg images > can be magnified a useful 9x) to check focus accuracy. As I expected (and > others have reported), there do appear to be some issues here, though not > anything like as bad as I feared. My initial impressions in this regard is > that the rangefinder demands that the eye is properly centred to ensure > best > focussing accuracy when using lenses wide open. Casual tests showed that, > with care, I was even able to focus my Noctilux (at F1.0) to a very > acceptable degree in the 1m-3m focussing range (at least based on what I > could see on the LCD). I have no real idea yet about focussing on stuff > much > further out but some very quick tests suggest that this may prove more > difficult with fast lenses used wide open (presumably triangulation errors > with the short rangefinder baselength are more likely to start coming into > play the further out you are focussing - even taking into account the > increased DOF in the middle to longer focussing ranges?). > > Generally speaking I am very pleased with the RD-1 handling and feel. 2000 > quid (the UK price) is a lot of money for what is really a Bessa but the > build quality is of a high standard. I might prefer a bit more heft with > heavy lenses like the Noctilux (I am used to an M7 with Motor M > permanently > attached) but the RD-1 feels right with my 35/F2 (which now becomes my > standard lens). > > It's worth noting that the packaging of this product is of an exceptional > standard - much like the beautifully designed packaging you get with most > Apple products. Obviously this is of no consequence to the RD-1 as a > shooting tool but it does at least give the buyer some confidence that > this > a product that Epson has taken seriously and has some pride in. > > As far as the handling goes, everything should seem very natural to any > seasoned rangefinder and DSLR user. The analogue dials are possibly a bit > gimmicky. Frankly, I would prefer to have a top-plate LCD with all the > shooting info in it. However, the dials are clear and concise (and there > is > something rather sweet about the way the hands swoosh into position when > the > camera is switched on). The other buttons/dials are absolutely fine - > shutter speed dial seems nice and solid, jog dial is a joy to use. The > wind > lever has a surprisngly short throw. This, I guess, is because there is no > film to wind on (just a shutter to cock) but it is initially a bit > disconcerting. Rear LCD seems to be as good as anything I've used before > and > the menu system is very easy and quick to navigate. It is also great to > have > the opportunity to turn the LCD around and use the camera just like you > would a film camera. > > As far as the finder goes, I am generally very positive about this. The > finder is bright (as bright as my Leicas) and the 1.0x magnification is a > real revelation. Being able to shoot properly with both eyes open so that > all you have between you and the subject is a superimposed frame is, for > me, > the way all rangefinders should work. It's like holding up a small > cropping > frame in front of you and using that to compose. What's not so good about > the finder is the rangefinder patch. It is significantly less contrasty > than > a Leica M patch and it isn't parallax corrected like the framelines - i.e. > it doesn't move with the framelines when you focus the lens. I presume all > Bessas are like this?. This, I suspect, is contributing to the focussing > errors that some are experiencing. When I look through the finder my > initial > temptation is to position my eye so that the frameline is centred in my > view. However, doing this, the rangefinder patch may no longer be central. > The trick, therefore, seems to be to position the eye so that the patch is > always central, not the framelines. Doing this, I was consistently able to > focus my lenses wide open in the medium to close range (as far as I could > tell from the magnified rear LCD view). > > Points to note which may be of interest to others. The RAW buffer is not > anything like as large as a Canon or Nikon DSLR. In RAW mode it is only > possible to shoot 2 shots in quick succession before needing to wait a > second or two for the buffer to move data off to the card (you do not have > to wait for it to completely empty). Not an issue for me because it's not > the way I shoot but it could present a problem for some. Also worth noting > is that you cannot set the LCD to automatically show an image after each > shot. You have to click a button for the LCD to enter playback mode. It > then > shows the last shot taken. Perhaps more annoying is that if you do use the > rear LCD to review an image you cannot then immediately take a shot - you > have to first press the shutter release (or the 'LCD' button) first. You > cannot do it with just one touch of the release. This bemused me at first > (I > kept thinking that I hadn't wound on the shutter). With a Canon you can > look > at an image and then put the camera straight to the eye without turning > off > the LCD, and take a shot. With the RD-1 you essentially have to turn off > the > LCD first - even if you use the shutter release to do that. This is not a > significant problem for me as I will largely use the camera with the LCD > reversed and out of the way, but I can see how the RD-1 will be an > annoyance > to others more used to taking a quick peek at the LCD after each shot. > > I should also point out that it is not easy to see the 28mm framelines. It > is about the same as viewing them on a 0.72x M. Again, for me it isn't a > major issue as I shoot mainly with a 50mm lens and my lesser used 35mm is > an > ideal substitute to get the equivalent field of view. However, I would > suggest that those who shoot mainly with wide lenses will find the RD-1 > less > useful. To get an equivalent view wider than around 40mm will require the > use of accessory viewfinders. I have a 24mm which will substitute as my > 35mm > but even here I am at the limits of the usefulness of the inbuilt finder - > at least for framing purposes. > > All in all, I am very pleased with the RD-1 and recommend it to anyone > wanting to use M lenses within a digital workflow. However, I would > suggest > that anyone who works at the wider end of the M lens range should be > cautious about the RD-1. > > Ian Watts > > -- > > mailto:i.watts@virgin.net > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >