Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have an M3 permanently mated to a Noctilux. To me, they're made for each other. The thick 50mm framelines, almost lifesize VF, and high EBL just work. I tried the Noct on 0.72 bodies, but I like my framelines to fill the vf. I hardly ever use the Noct in situations where i need to work so rapidly that the rewind knob and quirky loading made me lose a shot. Actually I find the knob better than the crank because I always lose the crank and have to re-tighten the film. The first version should be less than the latest version. The built-in hood of the latest doesn't bother me the least bit FWIW. If you find framing/focusing on an SLR easier than RFs... Jeff On Oct 27, 2004, at 11:40 PM, The Sleighteem wrote: > Hi. > > After reading numerous Leica FAQ's and M guides, I submit the > following: > > I believe I'm what you'd call a budding Noctilooney. I have never > used an M camera, but right now I'm deep in my Web researches to > select and buy my first one solely to harness the Noctilux. I'm the > first to admit that I'm smitten and not exactly rational. Here I am > poised to spend upwards of three-thousand dollars just so I can create > images which appear as though they were made by a large format camera. > Is shallow depth of field really something to loose your head over? > Maybe. Maybe not. I find it intoxicating, others find it nausiating > (Nausilux). All's I did was look at some Noctilux image galleries on > the Web and my quest was born. If this is folly, would you snap me > out of it? Otherwise, could I trouble you to read my questions below > and offer some advice? > > First, the body: > > The M3's stand-out EBL makes it a contender, but the improvements to > the M4 make it more desirable to me. Am I missing something > important? I think I'm willing to sacrifice some EBL to gain the > rewind crank and the speedier film loading. I thought I'd sooner have > the 4 than the 4-2 or 4-P. I would have to add a hot shoe, but I'm > willing to do that just to have the slightly better (?) VF/RF. Yes, I > see the 6 Classic and TTL bodies are practically clogging eBay these > days, but I thought the 4 could still be had for less. My prior RF > experience is limited to Graflex press cameras, stereo cameras, and > the Texas Leica (Fuji's GS690). I have always preferred SLR's, but > I'm willing to give up their framing/focusing convenience just to > shoot the Noct. > > Next, the Noct version: > > I'm chasing the first incarnation 'cause it has the slightly smaller > filter size. I have this notion that overall barrel could be a tad > more svelt than that of the subsequent versions (why I think that, I'm > not sure - if all of them have the same glass, shouldn't they all have > the same dimensions?). Will I end up paying a premium for the first > Noct? Perhaps the bargain specimens tend to be the second version. > Can you confirm this? I read that a retailer in LA will rent you a > Noctilux for the weekend for a cost of $100. That seems reasonable, > but I live in the midwest. As crazy as it sounds, I may just have to > buy a whole outfit just to experiment with this lens. But I wouldn't > call it pure extravagance 'cause I look forward to shooting the 35/1.4 > and the 21/3.4 also [some day]. > > Lastly, if anyone has a body or lens to lend (sell) to my cause, I > would love to hear about it. > > Thanks for your attention, and thanks in advance for any/all advice! > > Sleighteem > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information