Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] BD Colen and the English Language
From: msmall at infionline.net (Marc James Small)
Date: Sun Sep 19 16:01:46 2004
References: <BD711431.38AB5%joseph@yao.com>

At 10:51 AM 9/17/04 -0400, B. D. Colen wrote:
>Well I'm sure glad it's a reliabir camera, but I really wish that it had
>digital capabilities.
>
>And can someone explain to me how major global companies such as Nikon,
>Leica, and Olympus, can continue in this day and age to produce
>marketing materials in pideon English? Truly bizarre.


Uh, BD, we normally communicate on the LUG in English.  Just what would be
a "reliabr" camera or "pideon" English?

I presume that you intended to write "reliable" on the first, though the
context is a bit odd, and "pigeon" or, more properly, "pidjin" English for
the second.

Are my surmises accurate?

Marc


msmall@infionline.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!




Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] BD Colen and the English Language)
Reply from leicagalpal at earthlink.net (Kit McChesney) ([Leica] BD Colen and the English Language)
Reply from leicagalpal at earthlink.net (Kit McChesney) ([Leica] BD Colen and the English Language)
In reply to: Message from joseph at yao.com (Joseph Yao) ([Leica] All bets are off)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] All bets are off)