Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Karen, the plot thickens.... At 04:20 AM 9/18/2004, Karen Nakamura wrote: >... >* They are not long-baselength rangefinders (I don't know where Bob Shell >got his info that the new long baselength Zeiss is based on the R3A, it >might be but obviously not the rangefinder). The optical BL of the new >R2A/R3a is the same as in the R2. From the mock up picture, it is clear that the new Zeiss has a much longer baselength than the R2/3s. So why would they do that if they are basing it on the R3A? A long baselength + 1.0 mag. would be a killer combo for high accuracy needed lens like the Noctilux, 75/1.4 etc. no? Of course, there's the all important Q of digital or film... I wonder if this is one of the most successful teaser campaigns in camera introduction history, // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)