Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Leica UK?, could you give me the address? Thanks Luis Ripoll ? -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de Beddoe, Neil Enviado el: jueves, 16 de septiembre de 2004 13:26 Para: 'Leica Users Group'; Leica Users Group Asunto: [Leica] MP Viewfinder on M6 I got the following quote from Leica UK for my M6 which had a dicky rangefinder. 1: Adjust tension spring and spindles. Adjust shutter speeds, adjust rangefinder, check all functions: Labour 49.50. or 2: Carry out all the above plus convert mask to MP type: Labour 92.50 Parts 22.29 I went for option 2 and they turned it around in four days. All amounts in GBP and do not include VAT at 17.5%. Neil -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+nbeddoe=lehman.com@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+nbeddoe=lehman.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Didier Ludwig Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 12:02 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Re LEICA MP VIEWFINDER Luis Why don't you get a MP viewfinder for your M6 and spend the rest of the money for new lenses? Leica's offering to put the MP7 vf in all M6, M6-TTL and early M7 cameras (AFAIK the newer M7 have the MP vf anyway). On the message board of www.leicainfo.de I've read this costs less than 300 Euro. For a 21mm lens, as a good alternative there's the Voigtlander 4.0/21mm. Didier > >Thanks for your opinion. In fact I've never had flare with the M3, the first > >thing I was surprised with the M6 was the flare. My M3 works well, but it > >would be better do a restoring of the viewfinder (I think it's dieing) and > >vulcanite, M6 with meter are more comfortable, and at least I have the > >framelines of the 35mm. I can not very well understand a "top-notch lens", > >you mind i.e. a Noctilux?, I'm happy with my actual M-lenses: 35/2, 50/2, > >50/2,8, 90/2,8 (Ref. 11825), 135/3,4. Actually I use my Super-Angulon R > >4/21mm (excellent lens!) with the R to M adapter on my M cameras, but is to > >big and maybe I'll buy a second hand Elmarit 21 mm/2,8. > >Luis > >The 28mm f:2 ASPH is one.A true marvel. Of course the Noctilux is another >one but has a rather limited use. The 90mm f:2 ASPH is another winner and >the 21mm f:2.8 ASPH is another excellent and unsurpassed lens. Owning a M6 >your money will have a better use on this kind lenses than on a new body who >does not really add too much to the old one. Just my opinion. >Regards >Felix >PS I have preferred to buy a M7 to the MP, keeping my M6, as flare was not >disturbing me too much. _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice. _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information