Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Tue Sep 7 11:02:02 2004
 
I'm going to say - buy it up while you can get it. I know I'm in the
minority on this one - shocker! :-) - but I've never been able to get a
damn thing out of Neopan 1600. Tri-x at 800 is great, and at 1600 it's
better for me than the Neopan. But 3200? Recording Film anyone? :-)

B. D.

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Feli di Giorgio
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 1:43 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200


So, lets say Ilford goes the way of the Dodo and takes Delta 3200 with
it, what's a good replacement?

Neopan1600 (it's a little on the contrasty side)

TMX3200 @1600

TMX400 pushed to 1600

Good old Tri-X pushed?


I mostly shoot Delta3200 at 1600 and develop in DD-X.

Anyone?


Feli


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)