Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 36: Hilversum/Amsterdam
From: reddawn at singnet.com.sg (David Teo Boon Hwee)
Date: Sun Sep 5 21:12:34 2004
References: <413B4C8A.1050200@planet.nl> <6.1.2.0.2.20040905211045.02124e30@mail.screengang.com> <413BDF9D.3070803@planet.nl>

Hi

i would like to chime in and agree with Nathan. One of the "problems" 
with Leica M gear is the fact that often in the day, outdoors, i am 
unable to shoot with anything less than f5.6 in the part of the world 
where i live (near the equator). Esp with Tri-X rated at 400 :) There 
would have been no bokeh to speak of, esp with my wides!

Conversely, the Canon digital would be able to pull off a f1.4, 1/4000, 
with variable ISO according to time of day and position of the sun :)

nicely spotted Nathan! i once saw a monkey perched on top of a cyclist 
in Beijing, but my M was in the bag! argh :P

Boon Hwee

On 06-Sep-04, at AM 11:55, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Hi Didier,
>
> No doubt you are right. However, I have to say that in this particular 
> situation--walking around and snapping quick pictures in bright 
> sunshine--I doubt that I would have had my Summilux wide open. More 
> likely at f4 or f5.6, similar to the Sigma, especially since the 
> maximum shutter speed of the M6 is only 1/1000. But the bokeh would 
> still have been better. I have since bought a couple of fast Canon 
> lenses--1.4/50mm, 1.8/85mm--which do have quite nice bokeh too, but 
> again, in the situation at hand, I probably would have had the 
> aperture set to something smaller than wide open.
>
> Nathan
>
> Didier Ludwig wrote:
>> Nathan,
>> I like the first one most
>>> http://www.nathanfoto.com/paw/2004/2004_36.jpg
>> But I can't abstain from the comment that with a open Summi or Nocti, 
>> you'd have had more and nicer Bokeh than with your Sigma ... :~D
>> Didier
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> -- 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Almere, The Netherlands
>
> General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
> Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 36: Hilversum/Amsterdam)
In reply to: Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 36: Hilversum/Amsterdam)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 36: Hilversum/Amsterdam)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 36: Hilversum/Amsterdam)