Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/09/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] INCORRECTLY R.I.P. ILFORD
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Sun Sep 5 15:47:26 2004
References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040904213943.0208f3d0@mail.screengang.com> <001c01c492bf$1005a230$6601a8c0@ccapr.com> <6.1.2.0.2.20040904224610.02326000@mail.screengang.com> <413A4B0B.1040205@summaventures.com> <3.0.6.32.20040905122820.00809310@pop.mail.yahoo.ca>
Dan,
It's not empty. It's just getting smaller. It's an
issue of scale (vs. debt load, staff size, etc.)
Dan C wrote:
>A significant market share of an empty market doesn't amount to much.
>
>-dan c.
>
>At 10:44 AM 05-09-04 -0400, Jesse Hellman wrote:
>
>
>>"'Despite the decline in the monochrome market the
>>business has a very significant market share,' said
>>Les Ross of Grant Thornton."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
In reply to:
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] R.I.P. ILFORD)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] R.I.P. ILFORD)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] R.I.P. ILFORD)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] INCORRECTLY R.I.P. ILFORD)
Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] INCORRECTLY R.I.P. ILFORD)