Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Why do you think he put the model in the photo? To distract you, obviously, so you would not see the string. by the way, the distraction works very well. ;-) Gene |---------+--------------------------------------------------------> | | Sam <sam@osheaven.net> | | | Sent by: | | | lug-bounces+grduprey=rockwellcollins.com@leic| | | a-users.org | | | | | | | | | 03/23/2004 11:24 AM | | | Please respond to Leica Users Group | | | | |---------+--------------------------------------------------------> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> | | cc: | | Subject: Re: [Leica] no shadows on kyle's photo? | >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| You have utterly ruined the magic for me, Mr. Show-it-all. I believed my fellow man when I was told everything was as it was--no tricks involved. Why would I disbelieve? Yes, of course the fact of there being occult artifacts pictured gave me pause, but I thought the better and said to myself, "They are just props." I should have suspected you, Cassidy. You and all those cat pictures. I'm not a man to throw out facts to injure, but Lizzy Borden was a cat lover too, you know-- 'Lizzy Borden took an ax and gave her mother forty whacks, when she saw what she had done, she gave her father forth-one.' Sam S Kyle Cassidy wrote: >gene sed: > > > >>Did not see the notes at the bottom, but still not convinced. >>The board should have a prominent shadow either just left or >>below the picture on the wall and I don't see it. >>Either way a neat shot. >> >> > >i hope you're not analyzing UFO photos for the government. > >here's a closeup. > >http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/cassidy/temp/um.jpg > >this was during setup, which was probably 2 hours before the photo was shot, >but whatever photos are supposed to be there are there. > >kc >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information