Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you for the explanation Brian. Don -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Brian Reid Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 7:12 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Attachments? It wasn't actually an attachment, though I know that Outlook flags them as such. It was a "text part". The original message had some forbidden content in it, and the software removed that. Making a cut in the message divided it into two parts, neither of which is an attachment to the other. Microsoft mailers have never heard of multi-part messages outside the context of attachments, so they flag such things as attachments. > So what was with the attachment on the LUG? Some new capability or a > really clever virus propagator? _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information