Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples
From: Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:19 2004
References: <4057F0C4.2040707@osheaven.net> <OFEA8DEA9A.3EB2048F-ON86256E5A.0005E338-86256E5A.00061C45@crnotes2.rockwe llcollins.com> <A5DEF66C-77D9-11D8-9214-000A95CD9BF8@mac.com> <4057F0C4.2040707@osheaven.net> <3.0.6.32.20040317115152.008819e0@POP6.sympatico.ca> <4058B1FA.2090906@osheaven.net> <p05100330bc7e6c8272cb@[10.0.1.3]> <4058EC9F.6050301@osheaven.net> <p05100304bc7eedb41522@[10.0.1.4]> <003401c40cba$8560a3d0$3201a8c0@AUG01>

Ruben:

What is the definition of feinscmecher?  Does it mean odd?

And, Mamiya is out of the pro market?  I'm not certain that's true here 
in the states.

Jim - http://www.hemenway.com


Ruben wrote:
> Sam/Henning
> Would it have been possible to have 4 brands, canon, nikon, minolta and
> pentax + leica and contax compeeting for the professional market? If there
> is only sold one hundred 1200 mm.* tele optics a year and the same one
> hundred should be devided among 6 camera makers delivering goods for the 
> pro
> market that would make sixteen pieces a year eacg and that would not give
> much back to the research/developement departments of these companys?!
> (*and likewise with T&SH lenses and other special lenses)
> Its happening with mediumformat to - Bronica, Yasica and Mamiya is out
> leaving the market to Rollie and Hasselblad and perhaps Fuji. There will be
> feinscmecher brands like Silvestri, Alpo and Lindhoff but they do not 
> depend
> on their own lenses, so perhaps Minolta and Pentax did the right thing when
> then pulled out of the pro-market and instead was content with providing 
> the
> amateurm arket with som really competent equipment?
> Anyway even Nikon is loosing terrain to Canon, so the future pro 35mm/11-14
> Mpix market might just have one player left in a couple of years? - sad
> though
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Henning Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 7:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples
> 
> 
> 
>>At 7:26 PM -0500 3/17/04, Sam wrote:
>>
>>>I wonder if you can recall what was lacking in the XK system? It
>>>certainly was not an array of finders, screens, diopters, bulk film
>>>back, intravalometer, battery packs, motor drive, macro tubes,
>>>bellows,  copy stand, or lenses from fish-eye to 500mm. Here is an
>>>early system map to help you remember:
> 


--
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Reply from ruben at rhodos.dk (Ruben) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
In reply to: Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from attinasi at mac.com (Marc Attinasi) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from leicaman at sympatico.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from ruben at rhodos.dk (Ruben) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)