Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Daniel, You are asking about the HP 7960 and the Epson R800. Both these printers have a maximum width of 81/2 inches, the Epson will go 44 inches and I believe the HP will go to 11. The HP retails in the US for $229, prints color in the standard HP good way, and does a really good imitation RC B&W print down to the feeling that the image is in the paper. One catch with the HP is that you only get that result with all HP materials. Heavy matte papers at this time are not available from HP. The Epson R800 retails for $399, much less if shopped, and has a wider color gamut than any other ink jet out today. In fairness, the HP has a somewhat larger Dmax number. The R800 will print on pretty much anything including cardboard as you can feed material through in a straight path with no bends. Print cost will of course vary with substrate and image. I printed 50 something 8X10's on my R800 before I had to replace my black cartridge. The content was portraits with about 50% totally black background. Epson cartridge costs are in the $13 range. For the HP you will need the photo black cartridge and its price is in the $30 range. Email B.D. for his experience on prints per cartridge but he is on record as saying costs were high. I just finished an experiment with Arches archival matte paper and some Somerset watercolor paper. The R800 sent out some truly lovely B&W images with no curve changes. For these images I did convert from RGB to B&W in PS. From the ink usage I suspect that the printer switched to only B&W ink. Summarizing your question, if you really like or need high quality RC style B&W prints then the HP will be your best choice although in a high volume environment probably more expensive than the Epson due to ink pricing. On the other hand, if you like the look and feel of fibre prints and that is part of your work, then the Epson would be your only choice in this comparison. Print life in excess of 70 years would be typical for both machines if you use OEM ink and paper. I hope this helps. Don dorysrus@mindspring.com -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Ridings Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 2:54 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] the future happened yesterday > The truth is that we now on the downhill side of the mountain dividing > Filmland from Digiland...Filmland is behind us, even if there are many > folks who have chosen to stay behind rather than explore the frontier. > ;-) Well, some of us are just low-key about it. I don't mind the digital discussions, but on the Leica list, I keep to Leicas and we all know where they are in digital at the present. Not much to deal with there (and I wouldn't go Leica for digital anyway). :) Daniel (Frontier Boone) PS: As long as I'm off topic ... The Epson R800 or the HP XXXX (four or five numbers). What's the best way to go for printing budget b/w? (I regard those two as budget range so if there's something else in that price bracket, I'd like to know). _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information