Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] More RD-1 Samples
From: jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sat Jul 24 07:48:01 2004
 
You hit that nail on the head. Why pay twice as much for a lensless body
when the Digilux 2 is doing the job just fine?

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Ted
Grant
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 10:18 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] More RD-1 Samples

Dan C says:
Subject: Re: [Leica] More RD-1 Samples


> These are much better than the first batch, but there still seems to
be a
> softness to them.  Perhaps I'm expecting too much from a 6mp sensor.<<

Hi dan,
I'd not put too much into what we see here. But if 6 doesn't cut it as
better than my Digilux 2 I'll be sticking with the digi2 for sure. At
the
moment.

ted


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from mail at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] More RD-1 Samples)
 In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] More RD-1 Samples)