Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 06:59, Daniel Ridings wrote: > I'd go with HC110 B ... not that I've ever used TMAX-RS. I've used the > other one, TMAX, and really like it (liquid Acufine more or less, I've > heard). > > At EI 1600 you're not stretching it much at all. HC110 will probably give > you very pleasing negatives. > > Though I would shoot a test roll and develop it first. > > Daniel > > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Frank Filippone wrote: > > > I have a one time need to develop this film in one of 2 developers I > > have on > > hand....TMAX-RS or HC110. > > Does anyone have any experience on time and temp for a purely analog > > printing process? Shooting for ASA 1600. DD-X would be ideal, but I've read that TMAX-RS is similar. Feli > > > > The Massive film developer spreadsheet has HC110A ( 5 MIn) and B ( 9 > > Minutes) instructions, but nothing with TMAX RS. > > > > > > Frank Filippone > > red735i@earthlink.net > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Feli di Giorgio Visual Effects Supervisor "Hostage" creocollective - feli@creocollective.com