Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Why a digital M
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Wed Jul 14 07:24:22 2004
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNIECDPPAA.red735i@earthlink.net> <69C43FA0-D565-11D8-BDFA-0003938C439E@btinternet.com> <4dccee3d0407140634fcedfee@mail.gmail.com> <70471C01-D59E-11D8-B18E-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>
 
<sigh> - read the posts. We were comparing film scanning versus
straight-up digital camera images. No one mentioned analog printing.



On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:02:27 -0600, John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> wrote:
> You don't like doing it digitally!! You would prefer to correct colour
> casts and dust the old way!!! Have you ever done colour printing?
> 
> Yours rendered speechless,
> 
> John Collier
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 14, 2004, at 7:34 AM, David Mason wrote:
> 
> > To me the bug drawback with film scanning is the clean-up
> > work I have to do in photoshop - dust, color-cast, etc. Of course, I
> > don't have a very nice scanner either ;)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Why a digital M)
 In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Why a digital M)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Why a digital M)
Message from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] Why a digital M)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Why a digital M)