Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'll do a set of 4x5s tomorrow. And thanks for the correct photographic terminology for the sheet film's size, as opposed to 5x4. That early 35mm 'cron, with the 8 elements, the one that everybody is ready to monetarily put a shark hook in their nose for, has a lot distortion. In its day that was considered state of the art correction. S. Dimitrov > From: "bill harting" <wharting@verizon.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 14:49:40 -0400 > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Early images > > It's a treat to see some images other than those the LAweekly puts up on > their site (not to dis those) (or dis dose, for that matter). They may be > early but they look contemporary to me. The pictures also look wide than > 35mm to me; I would have guessed 21, but it just goes to show how wide a 35 > can be. > > You got more? (Sneak some 4x5 stuff in there) > > bill h > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Slobodan Dimitrov" <s.dimitrov@charter.net> > To: <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 11:45 AM > Subject: [Leica] Early images > > >> Found a few early images from about 30 years ago. >> They are done with an M3, and M4(black paint version). >> Lenses were a 35mm, M3 version and later, and a 50mm DR. >> Mostly Kodak film from I can remember. >> 1g is Kodak's infrared emulsion. >> 1h is recording film, rated at 1200. >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/album10 >> >> S. Dimitrov >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information