Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography Now Mark's screw up
From: n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sat Jul 3 09:44:02 2004
References: <BD0BEE2E.F62B%mark@rabinergroup.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040703111212.0160b030@mail.infoave.net>

I believe Mark's objection to the NY Noir was that the photographers 
were not identified. Here they are. So I guess your only complaint is 
that the prices are low. But what is wrong with that? To me, this is 
like buying an Ansel Adams calendar for $25.

Nathan

Tina Manley wrote:

> At 08:12 AM 7/3/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> 
>> > Big screw up on my part
>> > http://www.newyorknoir.com/about/ny_press.html
> 
> 
> But Getty is still doing it, so you can boycott them!
> 
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html/104-1115819-0840735?node=10758621
> 
> Tina
> 
> 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 6 30 868 671
General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography Now Mark's screw up)
Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography Now Mark's screw up)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography Now Mark's screw up)