Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/07/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] declining quality now why are these illiterates
From: feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Fri Jul 2 17:12:48 2004
References: <017f01c4605e$b9511e70$6401a8c0@len> <1088791944.4851.19.camel@failsafe> <001d01c46063$5cde5540$4649c33e@sigmafli1cclvg> <1088796065.4851.51.camel@failsafe> <007f01c46090$c9c69b90$4649c33e@sigmafli1cclvg>
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 17:00, animal wrote:
> thanks for explaining your point again.
> Still isn,t it unfair to compare the skill of Picasso with art students?
No, not really.I think it gives them something to aim for.
> I would presume that when a talent like that is exposed to no matter what
> bad teaching it would still emerge somehow.
> simon
Well, that's exactly it. Picasso was extremely talented, but raw talent
will get you only so far. He was highly trained and probably would have
never been Picasso without that schooling. My dad used to be an opera
singer and occasionally would train younger singers, so I've seen this
theory in practice.
Feli
In reply to:
Message from ljkapner at cox.net (Leonard J Kapner) ([Leica] declining quality now why are these illiterates)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] declining quality now why are these illiterates)
Message from s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal) ([Leica] declining quality now why are these illiterates)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] declining quality now why are these illiterates)
Message from s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal) ([Leica] declining quality now why are these illiterates)