Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Which twin is the problem child?
From: jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Thu Jul 1 06:24:37 2004
References: <1e5.242a1004.2e15675c@aol.com>
 
In my recent experience at Dillard and Delgado, I have seen:

Nescafe
Lavoris
Aquanetta

The late Jack Murray (used to work for WWL) worked in our Registrar's 
Office for a while after he retired. He kept an enormous list of odd names 
that he came across working in the vault for student records.

At 08:10 AM 7/1/2004, you wrote:
>A few local names:
>--
>
>Latrina
>London
>Rotella
>Brookaja
>Purifie
>Deemarrious
>--
>
>Regards,
>
>Sonny
>_http://www.sonc.com_ (http://www.sonc.com/)
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from jon.stanton at comcast.net (Jon) ([Leica] Which twin is the problem child?)
 In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] Which twin is the problem child?)