Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/06/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ignoring the little symbols, the D70 is a very capable camera. I haven't bought one yet (I'm letting others do the beta testing- Nikon has a way of getting electronics out a little early) but I have played with one extensively. It's clearly not anyone's dream camera ( the little symbols are pretty cheesy) but the picture quality and ease of use are really nice. Look at http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond70/ For a good review. Page 20 has a chart comparing the D70 and D100 with the Canon digital rebel. Of course, to keep all this on topic, you can't use Leica lenses on the D70...... My dealer has been told that he will not be getting any more D100's. He says that Nikon doesn't announce discontinuation of a product until the number of cameras already in dealer and distributor hands falls below a certain level, but apparently production on it has ceased. Allen >On 5/31/04 10:00 PM, "Bill O'Connell" <woc2@earthlink.net> wrote: > >> Hit delete if you have no interest in Nikon stuff. >> >> Not that we ever digress on the list or anything, but I have a Nikon >> question or two and since a lot of our members also have Nikons thought this >> would be a good spot to get some real world answers. >> >> My spousal unit is thinking of getting a D70. She had an Olympus E10, liked >> the camera except for the limited lens. For digital she has a Canon G5, >> which is fine for what it is, great for trips where she does not have the >> time or ability to pack her film gear, but again. lots of limits. We looked >> at the Olympus E1 but she feels the package with lenses is bit spendy since >> we already have a ton of Nikon glass and does not want to get a 2nd system. >> Her primary film camera is the N90S which she likes but wants to do more >> digital. Looked at the D100 but have been told the D70 better in many ways >> being a much newer release, although perhaps a 'lesser' model, and the D100 >> is due for replacement this fall. We have some trips and family wedding >> coming soon so she does not want to wait for the new D100, nor is she >> convinced the extra 1,000 or so that it will probably cost will be worth it >> to her. The D70 seems to fit her wants and needs so I'm looking for some >> input from some that may have one, or perhaps rejected it for whatever >> reason. >> >> Feel free to answer off list woc2@earthlink.net to keep bandwidth down and >> the troops happy. >> >> Thanks, >> Bill >> >She should hold both cameras in her hands before a decision is made. >The d100 might cost a little more and not be quite so cutting edge but is >not quite such an overt embarrassment as the d70 is. Nowhere as near as bad >as the canon rebel though. Both have flowers and mountains and other >pictogram modes which are an insult to anyone with the slightest pretense of >doing serious photography. And I'd hate to spend anything near that kind of >money without the back idea of doing non brainless photography. >Spend a grand and set it at "flower" to shoot a flower? >I think most people can deal with the flexible Program mode to do the same >thing. > > >Mark Rabiner >Photography >Portland Oregon > > > >New-improved >http://rabinergroup.com/ > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information