Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kodak BW400CN
From: jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Tue May 4 04:51:55 2004

Trust me, I'm not one of those guys who cherishes computer hardware
upgrades every year, but the current results threaten to send me to
digicams for good.

Your pic is nice and gritty (for those who like grit). It could work
well for some subjects (SP).

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of brad
daly
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 10:15 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodak BW400CN


On May 3, 2004, at 9:30 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:

> My Nikon Coolscan III has been a great scanner for color negs, but it
> doesn't seem to be able to scan B&W silver films worth a damn. I 
> ordered
> a Microtek scanner that does 120, 35mm, and XPAN pano.
 

      ^^^^^^^^^^
la la la la la i can't hear you la la la la

i will not buy a new scanner.  i will not buy a new scanner.  i will 
not buy a new scanner.

la la la la la

this is the result of TMZ scanned with the digital ICE enabled.  it 
looks cool on this image, but generally it's not what i'm going for:

http://www.bradbrad.com/eaglecowshavelanded.html

la la la la la

i will be satisfied with the scanner i have.

la la la la la

--
brad daly	
brad@bradbrad.com
http://www.bradbrad.com

What Would Bill Hicks Say?

All photographs are accurate. None of them is the truth.
	--Richard Avedon

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly) ([Leica] Kodak BW400CN)