Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Some sound arguments were made against my extreme position. I feel softened, albeit not converted. Sam S Mark Rabiner wrote: >On 4/15/04 9:31 AM, "Sam" <sam@osheaven.net> wrote: > > > >>I did not say they were not giving. I implied the $5000 pet operation is >>immoral because it's being spent on a beast rather than a human being. A >>beast who exists merely to amuse its owners. I would further state that >>bloated babies have a moral right to the $5000 in lieu of the beast. >> >>Sam S >> >> >> >> >> >What about Noah? I bet his vet budget was pretty high! Straight from the top >guy! Was there a people doctor on that ship? >I'm not plannying on replying to all 50 of these nice repy. > >Mark Rabiner >Photography >Portland Oregon > > > >New-improved >http://rabinergroup.com/ > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > >