Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I use Fuji 800 Superia or Press as my Universal film. Only a rare few times, such as the Civil War stuff recently, do I use 200. Of course, the lion's share of my outside work is digital at 100. If you give 800 enough exposure, the grain is not at all objectionable. http://www.sonc.com/my_new_pal.htm Sonny http://www.sonc.com In a message dated 4/12/2004 6:02:07 AM Central Daylight Time, daniel_ridings@yahoo.se writes: Mitch, It's really that good. I don't know if you want to drop Portra or not, I'm sure it has its own strong points, but Fuji Press 800 is a real winner. Daniel --- Mitch Zeissler <mitch.zeissler@verizon.net> wrote: > > Last night at the Tin House, I made a new pal > > http://www.sonc.com/my_new_pal.htm > > Leica M6, Noctilust @f1 , 800 Fuji, scanned at the > local Fuji Frontier Lab > > > > Regards, > > Sonny > ++++++++++++++++++++ > > Sonny, that 800 Fuji looks remarkably clear of grain. Am > I imagining it, or is it really that good? Press or NPZ? > I may have to dump the Portra if the Fuji is really that > grainless looking. > > Regards, > > /Mitch > _________________________________ > E-mail: mitch.zeissler@verizon.net > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lu for more information