Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]An excellent idea. Lea ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Sandler" <aaron.sandler@duke.edu> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 10:34 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Portfolio Review > Maybe a solution would be to have a main portfolio that omits these photos, > along with a second portfolio in reserve that could be brought out when > appropriate, such as if someone asks if you do this type of work. > > At 11:22 AM 4/6/2004, you wrote: > >Sonny, > > > >I agree with you that it appears to be a successful (if very > >discombobulated IMO) portrait and while there is certainly room in the > >world for this type of work, I just wouldn't put it in the portfolio. > >The purpose of a portfolio is to generate new business. > > > >99% of who contacts me about photo shoots are women. The two women > >who've responded to this indicate it should be dumped. I've had several > >women call and ask if I do lingere-type shots and I don't...simply > >because I don't feel qualified. If customers like your style, they'll > >ask you to do anything. > > > >If Phong wants to do that type of photography, more power to him and to > >his subjects because he obviously has good lighting skills and can do > >the work. Me, I'll stick with little kids and families and weddings and > >pets and everyone keeps their clothing on! Except pregnant women who > >wish to show off their changing bodies. There is a market for > >everything............ > > > >Lea > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: <SonC@aol.com> > >To: <lug@leica-users.org> > >Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:51 AM > >Subject: Re: [Leica] Portfolio Review > > > > > > > Lea and Tina: > > > As I am from Louisiana, I am sure many will misconstrue my remarks, > >but here > > > goes: > > > I left that picture out of my choices for the portfolio because > >style-wise, > > > it just didn't fit. > > > That said, it obviously didn't bother the subject, as she seemed to > >have > > > fun. So, IMO, it was a successful portrait. Portraits are > >different than > > > other types of photography. They have to appeal to the subject > >first. All other > > > viewers, including other women are secondary to the purpose. > > > In these parts, a portrait portfolio including several similar shots > >would > > > sell a number of jobs for Phong. > > > Girls here drive dually pickup trucks with diesel engines, go to > >rodeos, > > > cook for their men and kick their men's butts if they mess around. > > > Sonny > > > In a message dated 4/6/2004 9:39:02 AM Central Standard Time, > > > images@InfoAve.Net writes: > > > > > > >Phong, > > > >Your use of light is excellent; you've got some great shadow things > > > >happening in many of your images. > > > >Lea > > > > > > I agree with everything Lea said - especially about > > > > >http://www.phongdoan.com/Photography/PortraitPortfolio/12_crw_4833p.htm > > > > > > >From 2 LUG women! > > > Tina > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Sonny > > > _http://www.sonc.com_ (http://www.sonc.com/) > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >