Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kodak B&W 400 film
From: jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Wed Mar 31 05:07:54 2004

Hi Peter,

I have 400 rolls of B&W 400. Boxes of 200 rolls were left on people's
doorsteps next to Tulane University, and a fellow who owns apartments in
that area gave them to me. I get better results from it than I get from
silver halide film. I think it's pretty similar to Portra. Scans well.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Peter
Klein
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 7:52 PM
To: lug@leica-users.org
Subject: [Leica] Kodak B&W 400 film

I just received several rolls of Kodak "Black and White 400" C-41 film
from 
a local lab, in compensation for a recent Anomalous Processing 
Experience.  They only had consumer film, so when I mentioned T400CN,
they 
offered Black and White 400 as being pretty much equivalent.  I vaguely 
recall it being mentioned favorably here, so I accepted it.

Has anyone here used both Black and White 400 and either T400CN or
Portra 
400 B&W?  Is B&W 400 similar in  characteristics to the latter pro
films, 
or is it significantly different in some way?  At a glance, the
pertinent 
info on the Kodak data sheets looked pretty similar if not identical.

Yes, I know both the old pro films are now discontinued and replaced
with 
Yet Another Film, Professional BW400CN.  This week, anyway.

Thanks,
--Peter

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from pklein at 2alpha.net (Peter Klein) ([Leica] Kodak B&W 400 film)