Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:22:15 -0800
References: <r01050300-0921-F650A781263611D88AC25C10A1E6DFE0@[66.239.168.2]> <22575221-26C8-11D8-8437-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <p05100318bbf5b1770ab5@[10.0.1.5]> <C1834EB8-26EF-11D8-B6ED-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <p05100319bbf5e0c1306d@[10.0.1.5]> <357C14CE-26F9-11D8-B6ED-000A958F513A@jphotog.com>

At 12:01 AM -0800 12/5/03, Eric Welch wrote:
>Okay, so marketing information hasn't been forthcoming in the past. 
>I'm  glad this information is out. But the fact remains that 
>whatever comes  out of the camera at minimum settings is still the 
>baseline from which  one works. And I choose Photoshop for that 
>instead of some other  software that adds another layer to my 
>workflow and one more  opportunity to mess up the original file's 
>data.

Right on!

>On Dec 4, 2003, at 11:26 PM, Henning Wulff wrote:
>
>>I'm sorry, Eric, but you're out to lunch on this. _ALL_ bayer 
>>pattern  arrays need to be processed by some integration algorithm 
>>before  anything else, and some cameras (such as the Canon 10D and 
>>digital  Rebel, even do sharpening before saving as raw. See:
>>
>>http://www.robgalbraith.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php? 
>>Cat=&Board=UBB8&Number=181319&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=all
>>
>>and specifically Chuck Westfall's (Canon USA) comments:
>
>Eric Welch
>Carlsbad, CA
>http://www.jphotog.com
>
>Never slap a man who's chewing tobacco. - Will Rogers.
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@imagist.cnc.net> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))