Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard-lists@imagecraft.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:02:51 -0800
References: <p05100318bbf5b1770ab5@[10.0.1.5]> <r01050300-0921-F650A781263611D88AC25C10A1E6DFE0@[66.239.168.2]> <22575221-26C8-11D8-8437-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <p05100318bbf5b1770ab5@[10.0.1.5]>
At 10:53 PM 12/4/2003 -0800, Eric Welch wrote:
>No, that's the whole point of RAW, the image is straight from the sensor,
>no processing. Other than to create the RAW file format. No sharpening, no
>color correction, no filtering.
>...
Ahh.... I'm not an expert on this, but "raw" is not raw since the camera
needs to color interpolate the sensor data, if nothing else?
// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please
use richard@imagecraft.com)
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: TheLEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
In reply to:
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@imagist.cnc.net> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))